Literacy Narrative
I am against a party of people that profits off of someone else’s disadvantaged state. For this group of people to be showcased in the same theme as the political cartoon of a civil rights activist is politically incorrect and morally wrong. The man who was responsible for stirring up controversy through this political cartoon explained that his intentions were to open up a dialogue about hateful protesters. However, one must understand when one is morally right to protest against, and morally wrong to.
During the civil rights movement, many were advocating for equality. This was during a time where segregation limited many African Americans from receiving a proper education. Whites were more privileged and given better, more updated textbooks and learning material. During the desegregation crisis in 1960, a little girl named Ruby Bridges was the first to integrate into an all white elementary school. You can say she was the “bridge” in connecting these two separated races, despite the negative backlash.
As a way to represent this key factor in history, Norman Rockwell painted, “ The Problem We All Live With” in 1964. A painting about a young dark-skinned girl, wearing all white to emphasize her color of skin tone. Surrounded by Deputy U.S. Marshall for protection as she embarked on a journey to a school that was not welcoming towards her race. The painting conveys her resilience and strength as her posture is held dignified and her focus is forward. You can sense the intent and the responsibility, heavy on her shoulders. The hard R, N-word is graffitied on the back, a racial slur she most likely dealt with daily. A tomato is thrown not too far from her, but still, she remains unwavering. This painting is meant to document this iconic moment that changed the course of history forever. It is meant to empower those who follow after Ruby Bridges steps. To prove to those who were hateful enough, that they couldn’t delay this moment. Perhaps, it is also meant to evoke sympathy for she is only a child, deserving the same as any other light-skinned child.
Instead of investing their time towards benevolent acts within the education system, people like Betsy Devos are hindering the development of public schools. A woman who paid her way into her position rather than through qualified experiences, was conveyed similarly to Ruby Bridges. The man who compared Betsy Devos to Ruby Bridges was Glenn McCoy. Within his political cartoon, he demonstrated Betsy Devos as a frailer character surrounded by larger and heftier men. She was labeled a conservative and also thrown a tomato. She is also looking forward and isn’t showing a sign of weakness. “Conservative” and the “N-word” are the key offensive label for both visuals. To compare this woman to this pivotal moment in history is considered ignorant.
Conservatives opposed the civil rights movement, so demonstrating the political cartoon in such a way can evoke much sensitivity. Betsy DeVos’ upbringing can make her very ignorant and subjective towards her political decisions. She has rescinded transgender rights and has even thought of taking away a regulation that prevents discriminatory punishment towards students of color. Though she advocates for better schooling, she does not consider the economic situation that can restrict one to a public school, a school in which she considers lacking. However, instead of visiting these “underperforming schools,” she neglects it. This stirs up tension. Her idea of funding other alternative forms of schooling besides a public school, leaves fewer funds for it on the long run. This then leaves many students at risk of not getting quality learning.
Glenn McCoy statement about hateful protesting can also be identified as ignorant. Yes, maybe Betsy DeVos is not given a chance due to her reputation and initial hate. However, her decisions have left many victims of sexual assault, discriminatory accusing and transgenderism, angered and unsecured due to her lack of regulating safety. Betsy DeVos was mainly protested against due to her character; rather than Ruby, who was protested against due to her race. The causes of hate are radically different. Therefore, I cannot agree with Betsy DeVos political cartoon as the comparison is frankly unjustifiable.
To sum it up, Betsy DeVos political cartoon can be viewed as something that diminishes Ruby Bridges legacy. It takes the light away from Ruby’s actions and it does not justify DeVos whatsoever. The education system is in need of improvement, however, the solution might have to be closer to the root of it all rather than simply just looking elsewhere and neglecting many families’ situation that perhaps restricts them from having much flexibility. Glenn was wrong to place these two on the same pedestal when Betsy does not choose to prove how she is qualified to the people of the United States.

